Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.

294 A.2d 104, 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 939, 1972 Del. LEXIS 280

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware

DecidedMay 24, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 294 A.2d 104 (Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc., 294 A.2d 104, 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 939, 1972 Del. LEXIS 280 (Del. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appellant, Bramble Transportation, Inc. (Bramble), plaintiff below, asks us to reverse a judgment of the Superior Court in favor of Sam Senter Sales, Inc. (Sales) and Walter E. Heller and Company of Florida (Heller), defendant and inter-venor below. The opinion of the Superior Court is reported in Del.Super., 294 A.2d 97.

The facts are fully stated in the lower Court’s opinion and need not be repeated here. We concur with the rulings made by the learned Judge below. We agree that the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code § 9-402 were met by Heller’s filing in Florida, and that Heller, through the series of assignments, held a perfected security interest in the Draper account as of the date of those assignments, which was prior to the attempted attachment by Bramble.

Appellant’s argument that the attachment should remain effective notwithstanding Heller’s perfected security interest has no merit. Sales’ entire interest was assigned to Heller, so that Sales had no legal interest to be attached.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI