Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.
Opinion
This appellant, Bramble Transportation, Inc. (Bramble), plaintiff below, asks us to reverse a judgment of the Superior Court in favor of Sam Senter Sales, Inc. (Sales) and Walter E. Heller and Company of Florida (Heller), defendant and inter-venor below. The opinion of the Superior Court is reported in Del.Super., 294 A.2d 97.
The facts are fully stated in the lower Court’s opinion and need not be repeated here. We concur with the rulings made by the learned Judge below. We agree that the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code § 9-402 were met by Heller’s filing in Florida, and that Heller, through the series of assignments, held a perfected security interest in the Draper account as of the date of those assignments, which was prior to the attempted attachment by Bramble.
Appellant’s argument that the attachment should remain effective notwithstanding Heller’s perfected security interest has no merit. Sales’ entire interest was assigned to Heller, so that Sales had no legal interest to be attached.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
294 A.2d 104 (Bramble Transportation, Inc. v. Sam Senter Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.