Braman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Braman v. City of New York

244 A.D. 735, 279 N.Y.S. 67

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D. 735 (Braman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braman v. City of New York, 244 A.D. 735, 279 N.Y.S. 67 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by Lucretia Braman to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she tripped over an “ almost vertical ” rise of five or six inches in the grade of a city sidewalk, and by her husband to recover for expenses and loss of services. The actions were tried together. The complaints were dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case as to all the defendants. Separate judgments were entered dismissing the complaints and adjudging [736]*736that defendant The City of New York recover costs. The appeals are from so much of each judgment as affects the city of New York. Judgments in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. There was a question of fact for the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by Lucretia Braman to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she tripped over an “ almost vertical ” rise of five or six inches in the grade of a city sidewalk, and by her husband to recover for expenses and loss of services. The actions were tried together. The complaints were dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case as to all the defendants. Separate judgments were entered dismissing the complaints and adjudging [736]*736that defendant The City of New York recover costs. The appeals are from so much of each judgment as affects the city of New York. Judgments in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. There was a question of fact for the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 735, 279 N.Y.S. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack