Bram v. Oppenheimer & Co.

10 Misc. 2d 944, 170 N.Y.S.2d 146
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1957
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 2d 944 (Bram v. Oppenheimer & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bram v. Oppenheimer & Co., 10 Misc. 2d 944, 170 N.Y.S.2d 146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff agreed to be bound by the constitution and rules of the New York Stock Exchange and to submit himself to its jurisdiction. Beading the constitution and the rules together, it clearly appears that when plaintiff ceased to be a registered employee of defendant, which followed upon his voluntary resignation, he lost his right to collect commissions on sales he made during his employment, but payment on which was received by the defendant subsequent to his resignation.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted dismissing the complaint.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Misc. 2d 944, 170 N.Y.S.2d 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bram-v-oppenheimer-co-nyappterm-1957.