Bram v. City of Cleveland

645 N.E.2d 732, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1218, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 391
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1995
DocketNo. 93-2147
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 645 N.E.2d 732 (Bram v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bram v. City of Cleveland, 645 N.E.2d 732, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1218, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 391 (Ohio 1995).

Opinions

This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Butler County Building & Zoning Department
756 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
Chalker v. Howland Township Board of Trustees
658 N.E.2d 335 (Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 N.E.2d 732, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1218, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bram-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1995.