Braley v. Simonds
This text of 61 N.H. 369 (Braley v. Simonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The condition of the deed having been fully-performed, the unincumbered fee in the demanded premises was at the date of the license vested in the administrator under the statute, for the purpose of selling the same to pay the debts of the deceased. The fee did not pass to the defendant, because the administrator was not authorized to sell, and did not undertake to sell or to convey it; the right to redeem from the deed of April 3, 1874, or to perform its condition, did not pass, because no such right existed. What remedies the defendant may have is a question not raised by the case.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.H. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braley-v-simonds-nh-1881.