Braley v. Simonds

61 N.H. 369
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.H. 369 (Braley v. Simonds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braley v. Simonds, 61 N.H. 369 (N.H. 1881).

Opinion

*370 Carpenter, J.

The condition of the deed having been fully-performed, the unincumbered fee in the demanded premises was at the date of the license vested in the administrator under the statute, for the purpose of selling the same to pay the debts of the deceased. The fee did not pass to the defendant, because the administrator was not authorized to sell, and did not undertake to sell or to convey it; the right to redeem from the deed of April 3, 1874, or to perform its condition, did not pass, because no such right existed. What remedies the defendant may have is a question not raised by the case.

Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.H. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braley-v-simonds-nh-1881.