Brake v. Corning

19 Mo. 125
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Mo. 125 (Brake v. Corning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brake v. Corning, 19 Mo. 125 (Mo. 1853).

Opinion

Gamble, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The answer of the defendant, which was stricken out by the Common Pleas, merely presented a claim upon the plaintiffs in favor of the defendant, for alleged negligence in a matter in which they acted as the agents of the defendant. There is no connection between the claim thus set up and the note or the consideration of the note sued on by the plaintiffs. It is an independent set-off of unliquidated damages, which is not to be allowed. Cowan v. Modrell, 15 Mo. Rep. 424. Johnson v. Jones, 16 Mo. Rep. 494.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is, with, the concurrence of the other judges, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Gilbert v. Eldridge
65 Mo. 584 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
May ex rel. Lackland v. Kellar
1 Mo. App. 381 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Mo. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brake-v-corning-mo-1853.