Brake v. Brake

170 N.E.2d 908, 131 Ind. App. 389, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 186
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1960·No. No. 19,442·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ax, C. J.

This is an action for divorce originally filed by the appellee against the appellant. From a finding and judgment for appellee, appellant has perfected his appeal in this court, having duly filed the transcript, [390] assignment of errors and brief within the proper time. The sole error assigned was the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Thereafter, without filing an answer brief, appellee filed a confession of error.

Having examined the record and finding merit in appellee’s confession of error, the judgment is therefore reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Note. — Reported in 170 N. E. 2d 908.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brake v. Brake, 170 N.E.2d 908, 131 Ind. App. 389, 1960 Ind. App. LEXIS 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 1960).

170 N.E.2d 908 (Brake v. Brake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Indianapolis v. L & G Realty & Construction Co.
170 N.E.2d 908 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1960)