Braithwaite v. Grand Union Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Braithwaite v. Grand Union Co.

22 A.D.2d 941, 255 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2374

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 22 A.D.2d 941 (Braithwaite v. Grand Union Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braithwaite v. Grand Union Co., 22 A.D.2d 941, 255 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained as a result of a fall on a snow-and-ice-covered rut in a sidewalk which ivas used as part of an exit driveway from defendant’s parking lot, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, made May 7, 1963 after trial, which granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and dismissed the complaint, after the jury had failed to agree upon a verdict; and (2) from the judgment of said court entered May 14, 1963 in the defendant’s favor pursuant to said order. Appeal from order of May 7, 1963 dismissed, without costs; no such order is printed in the record on appeal. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to plaintiff" to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. In onr opinion, the question of defendant’s negligence was for the jury. An abutting owner may become liable for injury to a pedestrian caused by a defect in the sidewalk where he has created the defective condition or where the manner in which the sidewalk was used for his own business or special purpose has produced the defective condition (Wylie v. City of New York, 286 App., Div. 720. 722; Joel v. Electrical Research Prods., 94 F. 2d 588; Weiser v. City of Yew York, 5 A D 2d 702). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained as a result of a fall on a snow-and-ice-covered rut in a sidewalk which ivas used as part of an exit driveway from defendant’s parking lot, the plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, made May 7, 1963 after trial, which granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and dismissed the complaint, after the jury had failed to agree upon a verdict; and (2) from the judgment of said court entered May 14, 1963 in the defendant’s favor pursuant to said order. Appeal from order of May 7, 1963 dismissed, without costs; no such order is printed in the record on appeal. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to plaintiff" to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. In onr opinion, the question of defendant’s negligence was for the jury. An abutting owner may become liable for injury to a pedestrian caused by a defect in the sidewalk where he has created the defective condition or where the manner in which the sidewalk was used for his own business or special purpose has produced the defective condition (Wylie v. City of New York, 286 App., Div. 720. 722; Joel v. Electrical Research Prods., 94 F. 2d 588; Weiser v. City of Yew York, 5 A D 2d 702). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 941, 255 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braithwaite-v-grand-union-co-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack