Brain v. Rodelicks & Shivers
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 176
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 176 (Brain v. Rodelicks & Shivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brain v. Rodelicks & Shivers, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 176 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).
Opinion
When a rule for a commission has been obtained, it suspends the cause till, on application to the court, a vacatur be ordered and entered. But, if the defendant appear, and examine witnesses, it is a waiver of his commission, and the vacatur is unnecessary. The motion must be refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brain-v-rodelicks-shivers-nysupct-1803.