Braham v. Alameda County Superintendent of Schools
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
School districts in California, including County Offices of Education, are state agencies. See Eaglesmith v. Ward, 73 F.3d 857, 860 (9th Cir.1995); Belanger v. Madera Unified Sch. Dist., 963 F.2d 248, 254 (9th Cir.1992). State agencies are not “persons” subject to qui tam liability under the False Claims Act. See 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a); Vt. Agency of Natural Res. v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 787-88, 120 S.Ct. 1858, 146 L.Ed.2d 836 (2000). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed the claims.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
141 F. App'x 619 (Braham v. Alameda County Superintendent of Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.