Bragg v. Wright
This text of 120 F. 1018 (Bragg v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause comes before us upon the same testimony that was presented when it was last here. Wright v. Bragg, 37 C. C. A. 574, 96 Fed. 729. It is urged that that judgment was erroneous, and that we should review oun former decision and correct the supposed error. That decision, however, is the. law of the case, and we are without authority, upon this appeal, to disturb that judgment. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Lloyd, 46 C. C. A. 153, 107 Fed. 70; United States Life Ins. Co. of City of New York v. Cable, 39 C. C. A. 264. 98 Fed. 761. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. 1018, 56 C.C.A. 679, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bragg-v-wright-ca7-1902.