Bragg v. Wright

120 F. 1018, 56 C.C.A. 679, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4696
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 1, 1902·No. No. 832·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause comes before us upon the same testimony that was presented when it was last here. Wright v. Bragg, 37 C. C. A. 574, 96 Fed. 729. It is urged that that judgment was erroneous, and that we should review oun former decision and correct the supposed error. That decision, however, is the. law of the case, and we are without authority, upon this appeal, to disturb that judgment. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Lloyd, 46 C. C. A. 153, 107 Fed. 70; United States Life Ins. Co. of City of New York v. Cable, 39 C. C. A. 264. 98 Fed. 761. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bragg v. Wright, 120 F. 1018, 56 C.C.A. 679, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4696 (7th Cir. 1902).

120 F. 1018 (Bragg v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Lloyd
107 F. 70 (Seventh Circuit, 1901)
Wright v. Bragg
96 F. 729 (Seventh Circuit, 1899)
United States Life Ins. v. Cable
98 F. 761 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)