Bragg v. Tibbs
This text of 44 Ga. 294 (Bragg v. Tibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error brought suit against W. H. Tibbs in Whitfield Superior Court, and when the.case was called the plaintiff, by his counsel, informed the Court that he had an application in regular form for the removal of the case to the United States Court. The Court inquired if he had filed an affidavit of the payment of taxes, which was answered by plaintiff that he had not, but had filed the proper affidavit required by Act of Congress to transfer the case. Upon which the Court dismissed the case.
We think the Court erred in this decision. The institution of the suit constituted a case in the Court, to which a [295]*295motion of transfer under the Act of Congress applied, and it was the duty of the Court to have heard that motion and decide it in precedence to the motion to dismiss, for reasons too obvious to invoke any discussion.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ga. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bragg-v-tibbs-ga-1871.