Bragg v. San Jose

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Bragg v. San Jose

4 F. Cas. 7

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. Cas. 7 (Bragg v. San Jose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bragg v. San Jose, 4 F. Cas. 7 (circtndca 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

[Patent No. 173.261 was granted to Robert Bragg July 13, 1875, for a combination with a fire-tiiarm gong, for automatically releasing fire-engine horses from their stalls, and reissued January 4, 1876, — No. 6,831.

[This suit appears to have been brought against the city of San Jose to restrain infringement of the patent, and for damages and an accounting, and a decree rendered therein for complainant. .

[Cited in Bragg v. City of Stockton, 27 Fed. 509; Walker v. City of Terre Haute, 44 Fed. 74.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Patent No. 173.261 was granted to Robert Bragg July 13, 1875, for a combination with a fire-tiiarm gong, for automatically releasing fire-engine horses from their stalls, and reissued January 4, 1876, — No. 6,831.

[This suit appears to have been brought against the city of San Jose to restrain infringement of the patent, and for damages and an accounting, and a decree rendered therein for complainant. .

[Cited in Bragg v. City of Stockton, 27 Fed. 509; Walker v. City of Terre Haute, 44 Fed. 74.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 F. Cas. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bragg-v-san-jose-circtndca-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack