Bragg v. Murray

Supreme Court of Virginia

Bragg v. Murray

6 Va. 32

DecidedDecember 3, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 32 (Bragg v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bragg v. Murray, 6 Va. 32 (Va. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon inspection of the Record, (without argument,) the Court's opinion was pronounced by Judge ROAN~, as follows.

The Court

is of opinion, that the judgments of both Courts are erroneous, in this; that the paper on which the judgment was rendered, was not a bond, such as would justify the motion under the Act ~f Assembly; there being no sum mentioned iii the penal part thereof; ai~d that the same, with the execution on which it was founded, ought to have been quashed, if a motion for that purpose had been made. The Judgments of both Courts arc therefore reversed, and the motion dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon inspection of the Record, (without argument,) the Court's opinion was pronounced by Judge ROAN~, as follows.

The Court

is of opinion, that the judgments of both Courts are erroneous, in this; that the paper on which the judgment was rendered, was not a bond, such as would justify the motion under the Act ~f Assembly; there being no sum mentioned iii the penal part thereof; ai~d that the same, with the execution on which it was founded, ought to have been quashed, if a motion for that purpose had been made. The Judgments of both Courts arc therefore reversed, and the motion dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bragg-v-murray-va-1817.