Bragg v. Cumming

25 Cal. App. 804
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 28, 1914
DocketCiv. No. 1372
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Cal. App. 804 (Bragg v. Cumming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bragg v. Cumming, 25 Cal. App. 804 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

KERRIGAN, J.

The facts in this case as presented at the trial were identical with those produced and considered by the trial court and reviewed by this court in the case of Bragg v. Martenstein, (Civ. No. 1487), ante, p. 199, [143 Pac. 79]. The reasoning and conclusions of this court in that case are in all respects applicable to the case at bar. It follows that the judgment and order herein must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, and it is so ordered.

Lennon, P. J., and Richards, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 26, 1914.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bragg v. Martenstein
143 P. 79 (California Court of Appeal, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Cal. App. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bragg-v-cumming-calctapp-1914.