Bragdon v. State

123 So. 3d 654, 2013 WL 5538689, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15920
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2013·No. No. 4D13-3057·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition or certiorari is denied based on State v. Hill, 95 So.3d 434, 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), which holds that “the defendant’s crime of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon precludes him from seeking immunity under the Stand Your Ground law.” We certify that this decision expressly conflicts with Little v. State, 111 So.3d 214 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), on the issue of whether a defendant engaged in “unlawful activity” is precluded from claiming self defense immunity from prosecution.

Petition denied. Conflict certified.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bragdon v. State, 123 So. 3d 654, 2013 WL 5538689, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15920 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

123 So. 3d 654 (Bragdon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. James Patrick Wonder
162 So. 3d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Harvey M. Hill v. State
143 So. 3d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Brown v. State
135 So. 3d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
State v. Wonder
128 So. 3d 867 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)