Braga v. W. H. N. Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Braga v. W. H. N. Realty Corp.

41 A.D.2d 961, 344 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 961 (Braga v. W. H. N. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Braga v. W. H. N. Realty Corp., 41 A.D.2d 961, 344 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alla, for specific performance to compel defendant W.H.IT. Realty Corp. to convey certain property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 4, 1972, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action, which is for specific performance, and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action. Order modified by (1) striking from the first decretal paragraph thereof the word “ granted ” (which refers to the cross motion) and substituting therefor the word “ denied ” and (2) striking therefrom the second decretal paragraph. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion there should be a full exploration of the issues in this case. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alla, for specific performance to compel defendant W.H.IT. Realty Corp. to convey certain property, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 4, 1972, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action, which is for specific performance, and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action. Order modified by (1) striking from the first decretal paragraph thereof the word “ granted ” (which refers to the cross motion) and substituting therefor the word “ denied ” and (2) striking therefrom the second decretal paragraph. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion there should be a full exploration of the issues in this case. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 961, 344 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braga-v-w-h-n-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1973.