Braelow v. Louis Schlesinger, Inc.

163 A. 664, 112 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 921
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree in the event below will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 472.

We have noticed a slight misstatement of fact in the opinion which does not at all affect the result.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braelow v. Louis Schlesinger, Inc., 163 A. 664, 112 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 921 (N.J. 1933).

163 A. 664 (Braelow v. Louis Schlesinger, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Benedictis v. Gerechoff
339 A.2d 225 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)