Brady v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brady v. State

58 A.D.3d 992, 869 N.Y.S.2d 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 2009

DocketClaim No. 1; Claim No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.3d 992 (Brady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brady v. State, 58 A.D.3d 992, 869 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department) (1) from an order of the Court of Claims (Sise, PJ.), entered September 7, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for permission to file a claim, (2) from an order of said court, entered September 10, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for permission to file a claim, and (3) from an order of said court, entered September 11, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for a default judgment.

Orders affirmed, upon the opinions of Presiding Judge Richard E. Sise.

Peters, J.P, Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department) (1) from an order of the Court of Claims (Sise, PJ.), entered September 7, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for permission to file a claim, (2) from an order of said court, entered September 10, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for permission to file a claim, and (3) from an order of said court, entered September 11, 2007, which denied claimant’s motion for a default judgment.

Orders affirmed, upon the opinions of Presiding Judge Richard E. Sise.

Peters, J.P, Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.3d 992, 869 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-state-nyappdiv-2009.