Brady v. State
234 S.E.2d 532, 238 Ga. 618, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1137
Opinion
Appellant was convicted by a jury for armed robbery, sentenced to 15 years and appeals.
The sole enumeration of error is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We have carefully reviewed the evidence, and while the identity of the appellant as the robber was circumstantial, the jury was authorized to conclude that it was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242 (223 SE2d 643) (1976).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brady v. State, 234 S.E.2d 532, 238 Ga. 618, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1137 (Ga. 1977).
234 S.E.2d 532 (Brady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
223 S.E.2d 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)