Brady v. State

943 So. 2d 284, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918, 2006 WL 3422367
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2006·No. No. 3D06-2555·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady v. State, 943 So. 2d 284, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918, 2006 WL 3422367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

943 So. 2d 284 (Brady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marquez v. PanAmerican Bank
943 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)