Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brady v. State

Brady v. State

817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7991, 2002 WL 1233211
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2002
DocketNo. 2D01-1335
StatusPublished

This text of 817 So. 2d 1079 (Brady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady v. State, 817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7991, 2002 WL 1233211 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Darrell Brady challenges his designation as a sexual predator under section 775.21(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1999). He contends, and the State agrees, that the trial court erred because the civil designation as a sexual predator was not authorized by section 775.21(4)(c). An order designating a defendant a sexual predator is subject to direct appeal. See Downs v. State, 700 So.2d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with directions to strike the civil designation of sexual predator.

Remanded with directions.

CASANUEVA and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Downs v. State
700 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7991, 2002 WL 1233211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.