Brady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brady v. State

553 So. 2d 316, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2771, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6713, 1989 WL 145750

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2872

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 So. 2d 316 (Brady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brady v. State, 553 So. 2d 316, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2771, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6713, 1989 WL 145750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged in three separate informations with committing a lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child under the age of sixteen, contrary to section 800.04(3), Florida Statutes (1987). Specifically, it was charged in each information that appellant presented to a child a photograph of his genitalia.

Appellant filed a sworn motion to dismiss, arguing that the alleged conduct actually constitutes a violation of section 847.011, but not section 800.04(3). Appellant’s motion set forth the alleged facts upon which the information was based, stating that appellant threw or deposited the nude photographs from an automobile and that these photographs were then picked up by the named juveniles. These facts were not denied by the state’s response. The trial court denied the motion, and the appellant pled nolo contendere to all charges, specifically reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion to dismiss.

We find that the appellant’s conduct in the instant case does not constitute a violation of section 800.04(3), as appellant did not commit a lewd act in the presence of a child. We do not decide whether appellant’s conduct is violative of section 847.-011.

REVERSED.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged in three separate informations with committing a lewd and lascivious act in the presence of a child under the age of sixteen, contrary to section 800.04(3), Florida Statutes (1987). Specifically, it was charged in each information that appellant presented to a child a photograph of his genitalia.

Appellant filed a sworn motion to dismiss, arguing that the alleged conduct actually constitutes a violation of section 847.011, but not section 800.04(3). Appellant’s motion set forth the alleged facts upon which the information was based, stating that appellant threw or deposited the nude photographs from an automobile and that these photographs were then picked up by the named juveniles. These facts were not denied by the state’s response. The trial court denied the motion, and the appellant pled nolo contendere to all charges, specifically reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion to dismiss.

We find that the appellant’s conduct in the instant case does not constitute a violation of section 800.04(3), as appellant did not commit a lewd act in the presence of a child. We do not decide whether appellant’s conduct is violative of section 847.-011.

REVERSED.

SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 So. 2d 316, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2771, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6713, 1989 WL 145750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack