Brady v. St. Louis School District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brady v. St. Louis School District

412 S.W.3d 423, 2013 WL 5379831, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1104

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 24, 2013·No. No. ED 99321·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yulanda Brady (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yulanda Brady (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Brady v. St. Louis School District, 412 S.W.3d 423, 2013 WL 5379831, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1104 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

412 S.W.3d 423 (Brady v. St. Louis School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.