Brady v. Northwestern Masonic Aid Ass'n

42 A. 962, 190 Pa. 595, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1066
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 18·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this case that would have justified the court below in taking off the judgment of nonsuit. For reasons given by the learned trial judge, he was clearly right “ in refusing to admit in evidence the policy of insurance upon which suit was brought,” as set forth in the second specification. The evidence covered by the bill of exceptions is wholly insufficient to justify the submission of plaintiff’s claim to a jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady v. Northwestern Masonic Aid Ass'n, 42 A. 962, 190 Pa. 595, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1066 (Pa. 1899).

42 A. 962 (Brady v. Northwestern Masonic Aid Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. PA Ins. Dept.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Smith
172 S.E.2d 708 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1970)
Hare v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. of Hartford
173 S.E. 772 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1934)
Silverman v. New York Life Ins.
2 F. Supp. 184 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1932)
Snyder v. Nederland Life Insurance
51 A. 744 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)