Brady v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brady v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

52 A.D.2d 555, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 555 (Brady v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brady v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 52 A.D.2d 555, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered August 11, 1975, in the Supreme Court, New York County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter remanded to Special Term for a hearing and consideration of evidentiary facts to determine whether or not there should be an estoppel against respondent New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. (Bender v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. 38 NY2d 662; Economou v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. 38 NY2d 662.) If it he concluded that estoppel does apply, then permission to serve a notice of claim on the Health and Hospitals Corporation nunc pro tunc should be granted; otherwise, such leave should be denied. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered August 11, 1975, in the Supreme Court, New York County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter remanded to Special Term for a hearing and consideration of evidentiary facts to determine whether or not there should be an estoppel against respondent New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation. (Bender v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. 38 NY2d 662; Economou v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. 38 NY2d 662.) If it he concluded that estoppel does apply, then permission to serve a notice of claim on the Health and Hospitals Corporation nunc pro tunc should be granted; otherwise, such leave should be denied. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 555, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack