Brady v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

33 Misc. 793
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided December 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Schuchman, J.

The only point urged by appellant to effect a reversal of the judgment is, that the court erred in charging “ That if, while the passenger is getting off the car, the jury find that the car is started suddenly so as to produce a jerking motion, it is in itself an act of carelessness and negligence.”

This was not error. Bennett v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 40 App. Div. 626; Roberts v. Johnson, 58 N. Y. 613; Schalscha v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 19 Misc. Rep. 141.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 33 Misc. 793 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

33 Misc. 793 (Brady v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. . Johnson
58 N.Y. 613 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
Schalscha v. Third Avenue Railroad
19 Misc. 141 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Bennett v. Third Avenue Railroad
57 N.Y.S. 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)