Brady v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Brady v. Florida Industrial Commission

187 So. 2d 35, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3692

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1966

DocketNo. 35004

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 35 (Brady v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brady v. Florida Industrial Commission, 187 So. 2d 35, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3692 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument. We find that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of law. The [36]*36petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument. We find that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of law. The [36]*36petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 So. 2d 35, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-florida-industrial-commission-fla-1966.