Brady v. Feisel
This text of 53 Cal. 49 (Brady v. Feisel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The resolution of intention was to grade the street. The notice inviting sealed proposals was “ for grading ” the street, and referred to the resolution (No. 9,772). As explanatory, the notice inviting sealed proposals also informed bidders that the street mentioned was to be “regraded.” This was nothing more than to say that the street to be graded had once before been graded, and that it had become necessary to do the work over again. We see nothing in this which vitiates the notice for sealed proposals.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to render judgment for the plaintiff upon the findings. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Cal. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-feisel-cal-1878.