Brady v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.

153 A.D.2d 519, 544 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10870
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 17, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 153 A.D.2d 519 (Brady v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady v. Exxon Co., U.S.A., 153 A.D.2d 519, 544 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Turret, J.), entered July 11, 1988, which granted a motion by third-party defendant Dover Corporation/OPW Division (Dover) for a change of venue to Rockland County, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion for a change of venue denied, without costs.

Plaintiff James Brady sustained an injury to his eye when the nozzle of the hose on a gas pump malfunctioned on February 18, 1984 at an Exxon gas station located in Bardonia, New York, in Rockland County. On September 24, 1986 plaintiffs commenced this action in Bronx County by service of a summons and complaint. Venue was based upon their residence in Bronx County, New York.

CPLR 503 (a) states that "the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when it was commenced”.

Third-party defendant Dover moved for a change of venue primarily on the grounds that plaintiffs were not residents of The Bronx. The evidence does not support movant’s conten[520]*520tion. From the affidavits submitted and the deposition testimony of the plaintiffs, it appears that when this action was commenced, the plaintiffs were residents of Bronx County. The fact that they had a home in Rockland County on the date of the accident or that they spent a part of each year in Ireland is not an indication of nonresidency in The Bronx at the time the action was commenced. Thus the motion court should not have ordered a change of venue from Bronx County. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vazquez v. Clarke
186 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Martinez v. Semicevic
178 A.D.2d 228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Marin v. Schulman
176 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 A.D.2d 519, 544 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-exxon-co-usa-nyappdiv-1989.