Brady v. Davita, Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Lisa M. Brady,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv910

Davita, Inc., Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on July 19, 2021 (Doc. 18). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 18) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Defendant DaVita’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Title VII claims with prejudice (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Title VII claims are dismissed as untimely and this case will proceed on Plaintiff’s remaining claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and state law. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court