Brady v. City of New York

257 A.D.2d 466, 683 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 436
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1999·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about October 29, 1997, which, in an action by a laborer to recover for personal injuries sustained at construction site at which defendant City was the general contractor, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action was properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff’s notice of claim contained deliberately false information as to his name and address (General Municipal Law § 50-e [2]; cf., D'Alessandro v New York City Tr. Auth., 83 NY2d 891). Plaintiff will not be heard to argue that this deliberately false information did not prejudice defendant’s investigation (cf., General Municipal Law § 50-e [6]). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady v. City of New York, 257 A.D.2d 466, 683 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

257 A.D.2d 466 (Brady v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bessa v. Anflo Industries, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 2013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Bessa v. Anflo Industries, Inc.
49 Misc. 3d 587 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)
Rush v. County of Suffolk
35 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pastrana v. City of New York
262 A.D.2d 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)