Brady v. City of Mobile
This text of 299 So. 2d 779 (Brady v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ordinance breach for exhibiting an obscene film.
The film was seized as an incident to the arrests of the projectionist and manager of the cinema. No copy was made. No adversary proceeding for a judicial determination was available following seizure. A provision for a hearing before seizure in Ordinance 41-085 had been repealed.
We remand to the trial court to ascertain the applicability of Heller v. New York (1973) 413 U.S. 483, 93 S.Ct. 2789, 37 L.Ed.2d 745, and cases therein cited.
Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-city-of-mobile-alacrimapp-1974.