Brady v. City of Mobile
299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 19, 1974·No. 1 Div. 395·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Ordinance breach for exhibiting an obscene film.
The film was seized as an incident to the arrests of the projectionist and manager of the cinema. No copy was made. No adversary proceeding for a judicial determination was available following seizure. A provision for a hearing before seizure in Ordinance 41-085 had been repealed.
We remand to the trial court to ascertain the applicability of Heller v. New York (1973) 413 U.S. 483, 93 S.Ct. 2789, 37 L.Ed.2d 745, and cases therein cited.
Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brady v. City of Mobile, 299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).
299 So. 2d 779 (Brady v. City of Mobile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McHenry v. City of Mobile
299 So. 2d 779 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)