Brady v. City of Mobile

299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 19, 1974
Docket1 Div. 395
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 So. 2d 779 (Brady v. City of Mobile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady v. City of Mobile, 299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

CATES, Presiding Judge.

Ordinance breach for exhibiting an obscene film.

The film was seized as an incident to the arrests of the projectionist and manager of the cinema. No copy was made. No adversary proceeding for a judicial determination was available following seizure. A provision for a hearing before seizure in Ordinance 41-085 had been repealed.

We remand to the trial court to ascertain the applicability of Heller v. New York (1973) 413 U.S. 483, 93 S.Ct. 2789, 37 L.Ed.2d 745, and cases therein cited.

Remanded with directions.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McHenry v. City of Mobile
299 So. 2d 779 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 So. 2d 779, 53 Ala. App. 739, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-city-of-mobile-alacrimapp-1974.