Brady v. Blackett-Sample-Hummert, Inc.

32 N.E.2d 830, 285 N.Y. 540, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1575
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 23, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 N.E.2d 830 (Brady v. Blackett-Sample-Hummert, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady v. Blackett-Sample-Hummert, Inc., 32 N.E.2d 830, 285 N.Y. 540, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1575 (N.Y. 1941).

Opinion

Motion for reargument and to amend remittitur denied, without costs.

On the appeal we decided only that, even assuming .that the plaintiff is a part owner in the play or has an equitable *541 title to the copyright and that the defendants had notice of his rights, no cause of action arising from breach of duty of, or abuse of, a fiduciary relation, cognizable by the courts of this State, in accordance with the principles formulated in Underhill v. Schenk (238 N. Y. 7), has been established against these defendants who acted under license from the record owner of the copyright. (See 284 N. Y. 635.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League Club
201 Misc. 808 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.E.2d 830, 285 N.Y. 540, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-v-blackett-sample-hummert-inc-ny-1941.