Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A.

DecidedFebruary 13, 2003

Docket13-02-00649-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A. (Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-649-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

BRADY PRICE WELLS, Appellant,

v.

ANNETTE GROSSMAN KLEIN, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy⁽¹⁾

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, BRADY PRICE WELLS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-2138-F. The judgment in this cause was signed on May 10, 2002. A timely motion to reinstate/motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on August 8, 2002, but was not filed until November 12, 2002. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 13^th day of February, 2003.

1.

Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-02-649-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

BRADY PRICE WELLS, Appellant,

v.

ANNETTE GROSSMAN KLEIN, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Kennedy⁽¹⁾

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, BRADY PRICE WELLS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 01-2138-F. The judgment in this cause was signed on May 10, 2002. A timely motion to reinstate/motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on August 8, 2002, but was not filed until November 12, 2002. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 13^th day of February, 2003.

1.

Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brady Price Wells v. Annette Grossman Klein, of the Estate of Saul Grossman, and Corpus Christi Allergy & Dermatology Clinic, P.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-price-wells-v-annette-grossman-klein-of-the--texapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack