Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.

811 N.E.2d 545, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1244
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 21, 2004
DocketNo. 2003-1443
StatusPublished

This text of 811 N.E.2d 545 (Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co., 811 N.E.2d 545, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1244 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 N.E.2d 545, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brady-fray-v-toledo-edison-co-ohio-2004.