Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.

811 N.E.2d 545, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1244

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 21, 2004·No. No. 2003-1443·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co., 811 N.E.2d 545, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1244 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

811 N.E.2d 545 (Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.