Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00248-CR Style: Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: January 5, 2015 Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record Party filing motion: Court reporter Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: May 27, 2014 Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: January 5, 2015 Date Requested: February 5, 2015
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: February 5, 2015 No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Because the reporter’s record was originally due May 27, 2014, we abated this case and, after a hearing, the trial court found appellant to not be indigent and he paid for the reporter’s record on December 5, 2014. Accordingly, the reporter’s second motion for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record after the appellant paid for the record is granted, but no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Date: January 8, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. State (Brady Craig Koch, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.