Bradt v. Rommel

5 N.W. 680, 26 Minn. 505, 1880 Minn. LEXIS 201
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 10, 1880·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

That the affidavit of a juror cannot be used, on a motion to set a verdict aside, to show misconduct on the-part of the jury, is a rule of so long standing, so uniformly acted on by all the courts in England and in this country, including this court, that it cannot be departed from, whatever reasons may have originally led to its adoption. The rule, however, does not apply to any one but jurors. The affidavit of the sheriff was, therefore, competent, but it does, not show the misconduct alleged

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradt v. Rommel, 5 N.W. 680, 26 Minn. 505, 1880 Minn. LEXIS 201 (Mich. 1880).

5 N.W. 680 (Bradt v. Rommel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurlburt v. Leachman
148 N.W. 51 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Wester v. Hedberg
71 N.W. 616 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
Svenson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
70 N.W. 795 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
State v. Lentz
47 N.W. 720 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1891)