Bradsher v. Commissioner

403 F. App'x 872
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1754
StatusPublished

This text of 403 F. App'x 872 (Bradsher v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradsher v. Commissioner, 403 F. App'x 872 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wallace Wayne Bradsher, Jr., and Pamela Fogleman Bradsher appeal from the tax court’s order dismissing, as untimely filed, their petition for redetermination of the deficiency in their 2005 income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Bradsher v. Comm’r, Internal Rev., Tax Ct. No. 10S-6772 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 F. App'x 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradsher-v-commissioner-ca4-2010.