Bradshaw v. State

142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 823, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 643
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1928
Docket18658
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 312 (Bradshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradshaw v. State, 142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 823, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 643 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial was based on the usual general grounds only; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworih, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 312, 37 Ga. App. 823, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradshaw-v-state-gactapp-1928.