Bradshaw v. Sibert

165 N.W. 1074, 139 Minn. 490, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradshaw v. Sibert. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Minn. 186
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 14, 1917·No. No. 20,646·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause was before the court on a former appeal. 134 Minn. 186, 158 N. W. 830. It was then held that the contract involved in the action was a continuing guaranty, subjecting defendant to liability in the sum of $400. On a second trial of the action the letter referred to in the former opinion was received in addition to the evidence as it appeared on the first appeal. We are of opinion that the letter in no way changes the material facts, or in any way qualifies defendant’s liability as expressed in the written contract, and the former decision is therefore followed as the law of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradshaw v. Sibert, 165 N.W. 1074, 139 Minn. 490, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 641 (Mich. 1917).

165 N.W. 1074 (Bradshaw v. Sibert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradshaw v. Sibert
158 N.W. 830 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)