Bradshaw v. Sibert
This text of 165 N.W. 1074 (Bradshaw v. Sibert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was before the court on a former appeal. 134 Minn. 186, 158 N. W. 830. It was then held that the contract involved in the action was a continuing guaranty, subjecting defendant to liability in the sum of $400. On a second trial of the action the letter referred to in the former opinion was received in addition to the evidence as it appeared on the first appeal. We are of opinion that the letter in no way changes the material facts, or in any way qualifies defendant’s liability as expressed in the written contract, and the former decision is therefore followed as the law of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.W. 1074, 139 Minn. 490, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradshaw-v-sibert-minn-1917.