Bradshaw v. Ginn

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 27, 2003
• Docket: 02-7832
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7832

WILLIAM A. BRADSHAW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NANCY GINN, Work Release Coordinator; OFFICER WILLIAMS; DR. KOLONGO, Medical Officer; ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent; MARY TARNOWSKI, Medical Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-02-1563)

Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Bradshaw, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William A. Bradshaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing some claims and defendants from his action filed under

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order Bradshaw seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED