Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided July 24, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-00260·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-CV-00260-KDB-DCK LAUREN BRADSHAW,

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). (Doc. No. 12). Having reviewed the Motion, the Court will grant the relief requested. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and the Court awards fees in the amount of $ 3,900.00 . See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Under Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed. SO ORDERED.

Signed: July 24, 2023

Leta . we OD Sf Kenneth D. Bell United States District Judge nou

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security (Bradshaw v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)