Bradshaw, J. v. Luzerne Co. CCP Judge
This text of Bradshaw, J. v. Luzerne Co. CCP Judge (Bradshaw, J. v. Luzerne Co. CCP Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JOSHUA BRADSHAW, : No. 27 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE FRED A. PIERANTONI III, : DISTRICT ATTORNEY STEPHANIE : SALAVANTIS, CLERK OF COURTS JOAN : HOGGARTH, COUNSEL FOR LUZERNE : COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT A. : TAYLOR WILLIAMS, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bradshaw, J. v. Luzerne Co. CCP Judge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradshaw-j-v-luzerne-co-ccp-judge-pa-2018.