Bradney v. State

197 So. 2d 299, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4056
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 7, 1967·No. No. 35512·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradney v. State, 197 So. 2d 299, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4056 (Fla. 1967).

197 So. 2d 299 (Bradney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allison v. State
162 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Goswick v. State
143 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Brown v. State
191 So. 2d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Motley v. State
20 So. 2d 798 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Croft v. State
158 So. 454 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Garner v. State
28 Fla. 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1891)
Lindsey v. State
53 Fla. 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)