Bradlow, Inc. v. United States
This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 904 (Bradlow, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel, certain merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of the second spools for spinning reels similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of United States v. Charles Garcia & Co., Inc. (48 CCPA 140, C.A.D. 780), which was held dutiable as entireties with the first spools and spinning reels, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to the merchandise indicated by the notations of the examiner on the invoice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Cust. Ct. 904, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradlow-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1966.