Bradley Young v. Selene Finance LP, as Mortgage Servicer for MCLP Asset Company, Inc., the Current Mortgagee
This text of Bradley Young v. Selene Finance LP, as Mortgage Servicer for MCLP Asset Company, Inc., the Current Mortgagee (Bradley Young v. Selene Finance LP, as Mortgage Servicer for MCLP Asset Company, Inc., the Current Mortgagee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00001-CV __________________
BRADLEY YOUNG, Appellant
V.
SELENE FINANCE LP, AS MORTGAGE SERVICER FOR MCLP ASSET COMPANY, INC., THE CURRENT MORTGAGEE, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 23-12-19135-CV __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 29, 2023, Bradley Young filed a notice of appeal in Trial Cause
Number 23-12-19135-CV. The notice of appeal complained that on Friday,
December 29, 2023, Young had been unable to locate a judge to sign a temporary
restraining order to prevent a non-judicial foreclosure sale on Tuesday, January 2,
2024. We notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not identify a final
judgment or an appealable order, and we warned the parties that the appeal would
1 be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless the Court received a response showing a
ground for continuing the appeal.
Generally, in civil cases appellate courts review only final judgments and
interlocutory orders specifically made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con
Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An appeal from an interlocutory order may
proceed as an accelerated appeal “when allowed by statute[.]” See Tex. R. App. P.
28.1. We granted an extension of time until February 9, 2024, to file a response, but
Young failed to file a response or identify a final judgment or a written order from
which an appeal is authorized by law. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 13, 2024 Opinion Delivered March 14, 2024
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bradley Young v. Selene Finance LP, as Mortgage Servicer for MCLP Asset Company, Inc., the Current Mortgagee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-young-v-selene-finance-lp-as-mortgage-servicer-for-mclp-asset-texapp-2024.