Bradley v. Thomas
This text of 232 A.D.2d 598 (Bradley v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 17,1995, which, upon reargument, vacated its prior order dated June 2, 1995, granting summary judgment to the defendant dismissing the complaint, and thereupon denied the motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs presented sufficient medical evidence of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Jablonski v Bolt, 213 AD2d 982; Bates v Peeples, 171 AD2d 635; see also, Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D.2d 598, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-thomas-nyappdiv-1996.