Bradley v. Tarrant County, Texas

• Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
• Decided: October 10, 2025
• Docket: 4:25-cv-00866
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

STEVEN BRADLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 4:25-cv-00866-P

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants. ORDER

On September 25, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in the above- captioned case. ECF No. 29. The FCR recommends that this case be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Id. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the FCR on October 8, 2025. ECF No. 31. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the following: 1. The pleadings and record; 2. The FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 29); 3. The Plaintiff’s written objections to the FCR (ECF No. 31); and 4. The applicable law. The Court, having conducted a de novo of the FCR in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts them as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. If a court determines that dismissal of a claim is appropriate, it should be with prejudice if amending the claim would be futile or “the plaintiff has alleged his best case.” Jones v. Greninger, 188 F.3d 322, 327 (5th Cir. 1999); see Schiller v. Physicians Res. Group, Inc., 342 F.3d 563, 566 (5th Cir.2003). Therefore, all claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED on this 10th day of October 2025.

MARK T. PITTMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE