Bradley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bradley v. State

383 S.W.3d 67, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2012 WL 5207614

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2012·No. No. ED 97743·Published

Opinion

[68] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Bradley, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator, pursuant to sections 632.480 et seq. RSMo (Cum.Supp.2009). The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[68] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Bradley, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator, pursuant to sections 632.480 et seq. RSMo (Cum.Supp.2009). The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Bradley v. State, 383 S.W.3d 67, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2012 WL 5207614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

383 S.W.3d 67 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.